Activist agendas that step over the line and promote terrorist acts pose a real menace—to insurers and to society. There are also arguments that disagree with the question such as groups provide expertise, groups keep checks on the government and that groups allow people to be involved in the democratic process.
One of these is that pressure groups keep checks on the government by closely watching their actions. So the government are more likely to listen to the economic pressure groups because they could lose or win them voters. P is most significant.
For example All Bengal Student Association formed in They will be more successful than they would have been if they had presented the issue in full from the beginning.
The Internet collapses time and distance, and thus reduces the friction entailed in organizing groups of a few widely dispersed individuals. Beside this they are using lobbying method, strike, bandh, demonstration, funding political parties, using party platform etc.
This is unfair as ordinary people may be affected by these protests although they do not personally agree with these people. They help political parties on the eve of election and prepares election manifesto.
This poses a threat to democracy because it may cause less people to vote at democracy depends on people voting. Not everyone in the country will hold the same views as these members of pressure groups and so it is unfair if they pressurise the government into an action that will not please the whole country.
Some untouchable gatherings are additionally well off and utilize a lot of attention to pull in individuals to advance their cause. This view is shared by academics such as Richard Heffernan.
And henceforth influences policy implementation process. The issue may be more complicated but some pressure groups will make it appear clearer than it is so as to get the public on their side.
An example of this would be the pressure group Shelter, who campaign for homeless people. Types of pressure groups Almond and Powell have divided interest groups into four parts- Institutional pressure group-These groups are formally organized which constitutes professionally employed persons.
Ineffective for interest articulation-pressure group like trade union in India lacked trained and competent functionaries. This is important since formal political participation is on the decline. In conclusion, there are various arguments that support the question such as pressure groups engaging in violent action, groups with money succeeding more and that groups raise expectations on the government.
So the government are more likely to listen to the economic pressure groups because they could lose or win them voters. Voting is restricted for example those under eighteen cannot vote and so pressure groups are the only way for some people to be involved in politics.
ALF members harass and threaten laboratory personnel. This view is shared by elitists such as Mills and Putnam.
Home > A Level and IB > Government & Politics > Do pressure groups promote or threaten democracy? Do pressure groups promote or threaten democracy? Potential essay question on a unit 1 paper, just some notes on how pressure groups could be seen to promote OR threaten democracy.
Dec 20, · A pressure group is an organisation whose members share common interest and seeks to influence governmental policy. They differ from political parties in three key ways: They have no intention of starting up their own government – only influence the one currently in power.
They focus on one main Reviews: 9. Do you really want to delete this prezi? Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.
Delete Cancel. The topic of this conversation will be on whether pressure group action poses a threat to the form of representative democracy practiced in Britain. A pressure group is a group that tries to influence government policy but does not seek election for itself.
Are pressure groups a threat to democracy?. Read the description of the BMA How would you classify it as a pressure group? How is it successful? What are the reasons for its success?. Sectional, insider group, protective.
Doctors interests. Successful lobbying of MPs. Sometimes pressure groups might be seen as a threat to democracy because a relatively small, unelected group of individuals can force a change in the law.
Pressure groups may also have influence inside Parliament if there is an MP who is a member of the group or is sympathetic to it.Pressure groups a threat